The IRS Hobby Loss Test: Why Posting Content Isn’t Automatically a Business

A creator’s first real tax season usually comes with one question that decides everything else: is this run as a business, or is it a hobby that happens to bring in some money. The answer changes what can be written off.

The question an accountant actually asks

If the activity gets classified as a hobby, losses cannot offset other income, and the expenses tied to it do not get deducted as business expenses the way they would on a Schedule C.

The two classifications at issue: a trade or business reports on Schedule C, where a loss year can offset other income on the return. A hobby still requires the income to be reported, but its expenses are not treated as business deductions. The IRS does not draw this line with a single test. It weighs facts and circumstances, which means “I post content for a living” does not settle anything by itself. Two creators doing the same thing can land on opposite sides of this line depending on how each one actually runs the activity.

The nine factors the IRS actually weighs

The IRS publishes the same factors, in slightly different phrasing, across its guidance on telling a hobby from a business. None of the nine controls the outcome alone.

  • Businesslike conduct and recordkeeping. Complete and accurate books and records. For a creator, a separate business bank account and an actual expense log, not receipts in a shoebox.
  • Time and effort with profit intent. Whether the effort put in shows an intention to profit. A written content or growth plan is evidence of this. Posting when inspiration strikes is not.
  • Dependence on the income for livelihood. Whether the taxpayer depends on the activity’s income to live.
  • Personal motive. Whether there is a personal motive, such as enjoyment, apart from a profit motive.
  • Other income to fund losses. Whether the taxpayer has other income that could fund the activity as a loss-generator with no pressure to fix it.
  • Startup losses versus normal losses. Whether losses are beyond the taxpayer’s control, or normal for a startup phase.
  • Changed methods to improve profitability. Dropping a format that stopped converting, or switching monetization after a bad quarter, is evidence for this factor. Running the same losing playbook for years without adjusting works against it.
  • Knowledge to run it as a business. Whether the taxpayer or their advisor has the knowledge to run the activity successfully.
  • History of profit. Whether the taxpayer has profited from similar activities before, and whether the current one is profitable in some years and by how much.

No single factor controls, and the IRS says so directly. A creator with perfect recordkeeping but no profit history is not automatically in business, and a creator with one early loss year is not automatically a hobbyist.

The “presumption of profit” shortcut, and why it does not end the analysis

Creator forums frequently repeat a shortcut: turn a profit for a certain number of years out of the last several, and the activity is presumed to be a business, full stop. [EVIDENCE NEEDED: the specific number of years and the window was not verified against a readable IRS page in this session, so no number is stated here.]

What is safe to say is the shape of the shortcut, not its threshold: a presumption of profit motive can attach to an activity profitable in enough recent years, but the presumption is rebuttable. The IRS can still examine the facts and reach a hobby determination despite the presumption applying on paper. A creator who treats a few profitable years as a permanent shield, and stops keeping records because “the years already worked in my favor,” is relying on a starting assumption, not a guarantee. The nine factors are the actual test. The presumption, where it applies, is a thumb on the scale going in, not a verdict.

What changes if the activity is a hobby

Hobby classification does not make the income disappear from the return. Income from an activity carried on without a profit motive is still taxable and must be reported. What changes is the expense side: expenses connected to a hobby are not deductible as business expenses against that income the way Schedule C expenses are.

[EVIDENCE NEEDED: any specific IRC section, dollar limit on hobby-related deductions, or interaction with itemizing versus the standard deduction was not confirmed against a readable IRS page in this session, so none of that is stated here.]

A worked walk-through: two creators, two outcomes

The two examples below are illustrative composites, not real people, channels, or IRS cases. They apply the nine factors to the same starting activity, posting video content, with different facts producing different outcomes.

Composite one. This creator opened a separate business checking account before the first sponsored post, logs every expense against a rough annual budget, and writes a short quarterly plan for what formats to try next. Two years in, the channel is still losing money, but the losses track that plan. When one format stopped converting, this creator dropped it and moved budget into a format that performed better the next quarter. Businesslike conduct favors business status, because of the account and the log. Time and effort with profit intent favors business status, because of the written plan. Startup losses versus normal losses favors business status, because the losses match a stated early phase. Changed methods to improve profitability favors business status, because of the format switch. On paper, this looks like a business, even without a profit yet.

Composite two. Same subject matter, same platform, but this creator has never separated the activity’s money from a personal account, keeps no expense log beyond scattered receipts, and has posted inconsistently for three years with no written plan. Businesslike conduct does not favor business status, because there is no separation or consistent record. Time and effort with profit intent is weak, because there is no plan. Startup losses versus normal losses does not favor business status, because three years of unexplained losses reads differently than a planned loss phase. Changed methods to improve profitability does not favor business status, because nothing changed. On the same facts pattern, this looks closer to a hobby.

The point of the comparison is not that one spent more. It is the paper trail and the pattern of decisions, which is what the IRS looks at: the whole picture across all nine factors, not a single number or a single year.

What to bring to the accountant

  • Expense records tied to the activity, ideally kept separate rather than reconstructed at tax time.
  • A bank account used only for the activity, so the money trail does not require untangling personal and business transactions afterward.
  • Any written plan or rate card, even informal, showing the activity was approached with a profit goal rather than run on instinct.
  • Evidence of time spent: a posting calendar or production log showing sustained effort rather than occasional attention.
  • A record of operational changes made along the way, such as dropping an underperforming format or trying a different monetization approach.

This documentation is what supports a business classification under the nine factors above. It does not depend on any specific software; a plain spreadsheet and a dedicated bank account cover most of it.

Try followed for free

followed tracks pricing, plan changes and shutdowns across the social media tools market as they happen, sourced and dated. If tooling decisions are part of what you document for the accountant anyway, it is worth having open in another tab.

FAQ

Does having a business license or LLC automatically make my content activity a business for tax purposes?

No. Forming an LLC or holding a business license is a legal step, separate from the IRS’s factual test for trade-or-business status. The nine factors look at how the activity is actually conducted, not at what entity wraps around it. That does not mean an LLC has zero bearing; it may support the businesslike-conduct factor if it comes with real account separation and recordkeeping. [EVIDENCE NEEDED: any stronger claim about entity formation’s effect on the nine-factor test was not verified in this session.]

Can I still deduct any expenses if the IRS treats my activity as a hobby?

What is verified here is limited: hobby expenses are not deductible as business expenses against hobby income the way Schedule C expenses are. [EVIDENCE NEEDED: any specific itemized-deduction workaround, dollar threshold, or governing IRC section was not confirmed in this session.]

What is the single biggest factor the IRS looks at?

Per the IRS’s own guidance, no single factor controls. If one is most within a creator’s direct control, it is businesslike conduct and recordkeeping, since a separate account and expense log can be put in place immediately, unlike a multi-year profit history. All factors are still considered together.

If my content activity loses money every year, does that automatically make it a hobby?

Not by itself. Whether losses are beyond the taxpayer’s control, or normal for a startup phase, is one of the nine factors, not an automatic disqualifier. A string of losses that tracks a stated startup plan reads differently under that factor than the same losses with no plan and no changes made in response.

Sources

Back to Blog

Scroll to Top